12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
10
3
Beste positie
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
2.1
6.0
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
195
104
40

Nat

Nat
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Droog

Droog
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droge behandeling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Soelaas
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking