12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
4
5
3
6
Beste positie
#5
#1
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
10.3
2.2
3.7
4.7
Laatste test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
63
34
146

Nat

Nat
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Droog

Droog
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking