Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premie

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

e.Primacy

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

4

14

18

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

5.6

6.1

1.0

3.3

Laatste test

2025

2023

2024

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

111

47

64

40

Nat

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Nokian WetProof

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Natte zijgeleiding

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Droog

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droge stuurrespons

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Nokian WetProof

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Buitengeluid

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolweerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Nokian WetProof

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking