Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premie

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

Aantal tests

4

3

23

2

Beste positie

#3

#2

#4

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.0

3.3

4.3

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

111

40

97

176

23

Nat

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Droog

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Droogremmen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Droge behandeling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Droge stuurrespons

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Buitengeluid

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolweerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometrage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking