12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
4
4
18
3
28
Beste positie
#3
#2
#1
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
2.3
Laatste test
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
111
40
47
99
67

Nat

Nat
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Droog

Droog
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking