12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
4
18
24
1
28
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.1
2.7
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
111
47
302
66
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte zijgeleiding
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store