12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
4
18
4
17
1
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.7
1.0
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
111
47
40
80
66

Nat

Nat
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Droog

Droog
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking