Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

4

6

3

5

Beste positie

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.0

4.7

3.7

3.3

2.2

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

111

146

34

40

60

63

Nat

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Droog

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking