Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

e.Primacy

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

4

49

23

3

5

Beste positie

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.0

3.2

3.3

3.7

2.2

Laatste test

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

111

213

176

34

63

Nat

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Droog

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Droge stuurrespons

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Primacy

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking