Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premie

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

e.Primacy

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

4

14

3

23

Beste positie

#3

#1

#4

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.0

3.6

4.3

3.7

3.3

Laatste test

2025

Beschikbare maten

111

188

97

34

176

Nat

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Natte zijgeleiding

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Droog

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droge behandeling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Droge stuurrespons

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Soelaas

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolweerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

e.Primacy

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking