12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Michelin
CrossClimate+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Aantal tests
13
3
3
26
5
Beste positie
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.1
3.3
3.7
2.2
2.2
Laatste test
2021
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
85
40
34
66
63

Nat

Nat
Michelin CrossClimate+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin CrossClimate+
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin CrossClimate+
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Droog

Droog
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Droogremmen
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Droge behandeling
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Droge stuurrespons
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Michelin CrossClimate+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Tractie op sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Remmen op sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
77%
Sneeuwverwerking
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Buitengeluid
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Inwendig geluid
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolweerstand
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometrage
Michelin CrossClimate+
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Prijs/waarde
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking