Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premie

Michelin

CrossClimate+

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

Goodyear

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

CrossClimate+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

13

18

1

14

3

Beste positie

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

4.1

6.1

1.0

5.5

3.7

Laatste test

2021

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

85

47

64

706

34

Nat

Michelin CrossClimate+

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin CrossClimate+

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin CrossClimate+

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin CrossClimate+

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin CrossClimate+

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin CrossClimate+

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Droog

Michelin CrossClimate+

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droge behandeling

Michelin CrossClimate+

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Droogremmen

Michelin CrossClimate+

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge stuurrespons

Michelin CrossClimate+

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Michelin CrossClimate+

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Sneeuwverwerking

Michelin CrossClimate+

81%

Tractie op sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate+

82%

Remmen op sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate+

77%

Soelaas

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Soelaas

Michelin CrossClimate+

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Kosten

Michelin CrossClimate+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Michelin CrossClimate+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrage

Michelin CrossClimate+

98%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Prijs/waarde

Michelin CrossClimate+

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

CrossClimate+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking