12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Michelin
CrossClimate+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
13
18
3
1
2
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.1
6.1
3.3
1.0
1.0
Laatste test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
85
47
40
64
23

Nat

Nat
Michelin CrossClimate+
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin CrossClimate+
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin CrossClimate+
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin CrossClimate+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Droog

Droog
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Droogremmen
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Droge behandeling
Michelin CrossClimate+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Tractie op sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
82%
Remmen op sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate+
77%
Sneeuwverwerking
Michelin CrossClimate+
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Buitengeluid
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolweerstand
Michelin CrossClimate+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometrage
Michelin CrossClimate+
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Prijs/waarde
Michelin CrossClimate+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking