Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Premie

Michelin

CrossClimate 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato All Season SF3

Testprofiel

CrossClimate 2

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Aantal tests

24

1

3

16

Beste positie

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

2.7

1.0

3.3

3.1

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

151

27

40

86

Sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Tractie op sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Sneeuwverwerking

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Remmen op sneeuw

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Sneeuw in bochten

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Nat

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Droog

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Droge behandeling

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Droogremmen

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Kosten

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolweerstand

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Prijs/waarde

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Kilometrage

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Soelaas

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Buitengeluid

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Soelaas

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Inwendig geluid

Michelin CrossClimate 2

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Vredestein Quatrac

95%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Testprofiel

Sneeuw

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking