12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
2
18
10
6
4
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
1.5
6.1
6.0
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
54
47
109
146
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Droog
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store