12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
2
18
21
4
3
1
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
1.5
6.1
11.9
3.3
3.7
1.0
Laatste test
2024
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
54
47
165
40
36
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Sneeuw
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Droog
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Soelaas
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Buitengeluid
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store