Vergelijking: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premie

Michelin

Agilis+

R14 – R17

VS

Bovenmidden

Hankook

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Agilis+

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

3

6

4

Beste positie

#10

#1

#2

#3

#2

Gemiddelde positie

10.0

1.0

3.7

4.7

3.3

Laatste test

2019

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

32

27

36

146

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Michelin Agilis+

60%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Michelin Agilis+

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Michelin Agilis+

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Michelin Agilis+

89%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Michelin Agilis+

33%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Michelin Agilis+

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Soelaas

Michelin Agilis+

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Buitengeluid

Michelin Agilis+

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kosten

Michelin Agilis+

94%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kilometrage

Michelin Agilis+

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Droog

Michelin Agilis+

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Michelin Agilis+ vs Pirelli CARRIER

Michelin Agilis+ vs Hankook Vantra LT RA18

Michelin Agilis+ vs GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo

Michelin Agilis+ vs Kleber Transpro

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Agilis+

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking