12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Michelin
Agilis+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
1
18
1
6
Beste positie
#10
#1
#1
#3
Gemiddelde positie
10.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
Laatste test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
47
27
146

Nat

Nat
Michelin Agilis+
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin Agilis+
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin Agilis+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin Agilis+
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin Agilis+
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Michelin Agilis+
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
Michelin Agilis+
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Droog

Droog
Michelin Agilis+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking