12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Michelin
Agilis+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
6
3
4
Beste positie
#10
#3
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
10.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
32
146
36
40

Nat

Nat
Michelin Agilis+
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Michelin Agilis+
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Michelin Agilis+
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Michelin Agilis+
33%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Michelin Agilis+
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin Agilis+
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Michelin Agilis+
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Droog

Droog
Michelin Agilis+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometrage
Michelin Agilis+
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking