Vergelijking: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Linglong

Grip Master 4S

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Grip Master 4S

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Aantal tests

5

14

3

1

Beste positie

#4

#8

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.6

13.4

3.7

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

85

153

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Linglong Grip Master 4S

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Linglong Grip Master 4S

49%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Sneeuw

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

Kosten

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kilometrage

Linglong Grip Master 4S

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Prijs/waarde

Linglong Grip Master 4S

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Rolweerstand

Linglong Grip Master 4S

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Soelaas

Linglong Grip Master 4S

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Linglong Grip Master 4S

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Linglong Grip Master 4S

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Droog

Linglong Grip Master 4S

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Linglong Grip Master 4S

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Linglong Grip Master 4S

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Grip Master 4S

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking