Vergelijking: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Bovenmidden

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

5.5

R13 – R21

VS

GT

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

10

3

49

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

12.2

9.7

3.2

Laatste test

2024

Beschikbare maten

207

32

213

Nat

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

54%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

56%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Sneeuw

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Remmen op sneeuw

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sneeuwverwerking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Sneeuw in bochten

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Soelaas

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Buitengeluid

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

60%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Soelaas

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Inwendig geluid

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Kosten

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Rolweerstand

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kilometrage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

72%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

45%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Prijs/waarde

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Offroad

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Droog

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Droogremmen

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Droge behandeling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

62%

GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

44%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52

Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Kosten

Offroad

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking