12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Kumho WinterCraft WP52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52

5.5
R13 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Continental WinterContact TS 870Premie
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870

9.9
R14 – R18
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 PremiumContact 7 UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
10
18
17
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.2
6.1
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
207
47
80
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Sneeuw
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Soelaas
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Offroad
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Droog
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste winterbanden voor sneeuwBeste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Barum Polaris 5Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Uniroyal WinterExpertKumho WinterCraft WP52 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store