12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
3
3
3
5
14
Beste positie
#4
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
97
40
34
63
188

Nat

Nat
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Natte prestaties
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuwverwerking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tractie op sneeuw
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Remmen op sneeuw
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Sneeuw in bochten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Droog

Droog
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droge behandeling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Droge prestaties
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Rolweerstand
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Soelaas
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Buitengeluid
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking