Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Ecsta PS71

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

15

18

3

1

3

Beste positie

#2

#1

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

9.0

6.1

3.3

1.0

3.7

Laatste test

2025

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

225

47

40

64

34

Nat

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Prijs/waarde

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta PS71

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Offroad

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking