Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta PS71 SUV

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Ecsta PS71 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

1

5

3

1

Beste positie

#6

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

2.2

3.7

3.3

1.0

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

55

63

34

40

64

Nat

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Offroad

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Ecsta PS71 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Offroad

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking