Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

10

4

18

5

4

3

5

Beste positie

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

12.0

6.1

2.8

3.3

3.7

2.2

Laatste test

2026

2025

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

109

111

47

139

40

36

63

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigen Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking