12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
10
4
18
4
6
1
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
1.0
Laatste test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
111
47
40
146
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store