12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
4
28
18
3
4
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
12.0
2.3
6.1
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
111
67
47
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store