Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

10

2

3

5

Beste positie

#2

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

1.5

3.7

2.2

Laatste test

2026

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

109

54

36

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

71%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

74%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

CrossClimate 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking