12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

2 gemeenschappelijke test(s) met gedetailleerde gegevens

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
10
14
18
28
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.3
6.1
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2026
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
532
47
68

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
98%
Continental PremiumContact 7
46%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
43%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
38%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
43%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
46%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
39%
Comfort & geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
89%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Exterieurgeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Interieurgeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
68%
Economie
Kumho Ecsta HS52
51%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
1%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
34%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
1%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2024205/55 R16Bekijk
ADACADAC
De zomer
2024215/55 R17Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store