Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

10

5

13

5

Beste positie

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

2.8

4.3

2.2

Laatste test

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

109

139

123

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Michelin Primacy 4+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking