Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Aantal tests

10

3

26

Beste positie

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

3.3

2.2

Laatste test

2026

Beschikbare maten

104

60

40

66

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Inwendig geluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Prijs/waarde

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking