12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
10
1
14
4
6
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
1.0
3.6
3.3
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
27
194
40
146

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store