Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

10

3

1

23

5

Beste positie

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

3.3

1.0

3.3

2.2

Laatste test

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

104

40

64

176

63

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Inwendig geluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Prijs/waarde

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking