12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Dunlop WinterPremie
DunlopDunlop

Winter

9.3
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Aantal tests
10
16
23
4
3
2
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
5.5
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.5
Laatste test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
153
176
40
36
66

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store