12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Vredestein
Quatrac
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
18
16
4
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.1
3.1
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
47
88
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store