12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
18
1
5
3
3
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.1
1.0
2.2
3.7
3.3
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
104
47
27
63
34
40
40

Nat

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Droog

Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking