12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
10
18
1
5
4
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.1
1.0
2.2
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
47
66
63
40
36

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store