12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Aantal tests
10
18
3
4
24
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
47
36
40
151

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store