12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
18
3
28
4
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.1
3.7
2.3
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
47
36
67
40

Nat

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Droog

Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store