Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

10

21

3

Beste positie

#2

Gemiddelde positie

6.0

11.9

3.3

3.7

Laatste test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

104

164

40

34

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Inwendig geluid

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge behandeling

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Prijs/waarde

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking