12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Dunlop
Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
10
6
2
3
Beste positie
#2
#3
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
4.7
1.5
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
104
146
65
34

Nat

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking