12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Dunlop WinterPremie
DunlopDunlop

Winter

9.3
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dunlop
Winter
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
10
2
4
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
1.5
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
66
40
36

Nat

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Dunlop Winter
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Dunlop Winter
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Dunlop Winter
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Dunlop Winter
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Dunlop Winter
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Dunlop Winter
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto'sBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNDunlop Winter vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PDunlop Winter vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Dunlop Winter vs Bridgestone Blizzak 6Dunlop Winter vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking