12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Continental WinterContact TS 870Premie
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870

9.9
R14 – R18
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
10
17
4
14
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
1.7
3.3
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
80
40
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofContinental WinterContact TS 870 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store