12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
10
1
4
18
3
Beste positie
#2
#7
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
7.0
3.3
6.1
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2023
2026
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
88
40
47
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store