12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Aantal tests
10
1
18
4
5
Beste positie
#2
#7
#1
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
7.0
6.1
3.3
4.8
Laatste test
2026
2023
2024
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
88
47
40
158

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store