12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Continental UltraContactPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact

5.3
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Vergelijk ook met
Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7 Cinturato P7 C2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
1
18
Beste positie
#2
#7
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
7.0
6.1
Laatste test
2026
2023
2024
Beschikbare maten
109
88
47
Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
ADACADAC
De zomer
2023205/55 R16Bekijk

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evsBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofContinental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceContinental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store