12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
10
1
6
Beste positie
#2
#7
#3
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
7.0
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2023
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
88
146
Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store