12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
10
49
4
3
24
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.2
3.3
3.7
2.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
109
213
40
36
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Inwendig geluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunBridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PBridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store