12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
10
14
6
3
4
Beste positie
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.6
4.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
109
194
146
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Droog
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Prijs/waarde
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store